Makos 22b- 23a Shiur 09/01/2015

Makos 22b- 23a

1- Our Mishna states that if the Shliach Beis Din administering the malkus errs and gives one extra (more than the evaluation) and causes the death of the defendant he is ‘patur’ but needs to go to ‘galus’.

Rivan-designstyle-love-heart-m
The Rivan (Rashi’s son-in-law) introduces the classic question of ’10 people who strike a man and the victim dies, all are exempt including the last one that hit (the 10th)’.

So why in our case is the Shliach obligated to go to Golus?

2- The Gemara talks about ‘Loshon Hora’. We discussed the various opinions if it applies to gossiping something that is actually true.
The Gemara adds that one who talks Loshon Hora ‘deserves to be thrown to the dogs’.


We mentioned that the Ariza”l says that the reason the Gemara chooses the term ‘dogs’ is because one that talks Loshon Hora is reincarnated into a dog.

 

dog reincarnated as a tree

3- We discussed the difference between the good deeds of the dogs that didn’t bark by Yetzias Mitzraim as opposed the the frogs that went on Mesiras Nefesh by jumping into the ovens (by ‘makas Tze’fardeah).

ok, everybody in!

Why were the dogs rewarded for posterity (all treifa meat is given to them) and not the frogs?

A-It’s harder to keep your mouth closed than jumping into a fire……


B- frogs have no relationship with the original brave frogs two millenniums ago. One the other hand mother in law miss‘alle hint fun alle doros zeinen kroivim un mechutonim’.
All barking dogs have a commonality and thus are related……

4- We spoke about the two Misnagdishe camps that don’t exactly get along. Chazon Ish versus the Brisker.
One is very stringent on the topic of Shiurim (ke’zayis) the other is even more machmir.

ocd1
The first group claims that the second suffers from OCD……

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *